Monday, November 30, 2015

4chan, Reddit and Gamergate: How Sexism Becomes Dangerous Online



Most people who use the internet are familiar with social media and news aggregating websites. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Yahoo, Google News, the list goes on. It is not hard to find examples of gender based disparity on these websites. When the trending topics on Facebook and the top articles on yahoo have to do with men, they are either in relation to businessmen, star athletes or world leaders. When they have to do with women or femininity, the topics are limited to hair, clothes or the female body and are almost always rank with objectification.  While this sexism far from desirable, it is nothing compared to the outright and dangerous “anti-feminism” that has developed on less well known websites like 4chan and Reddit. This “anti-feminism” has resulted in vast campaigns of online harassment that is truly dangerous for women who use the internet.

4chan is an entirely anonymous online community populated predominantly by technically savvy, white males. Many of the most famous gags on the internet (think Rick Rolling) developed on 4chan, however, before 2014 most internet users had never heard of the site. That’s because in 2014, 4chan (a bastion of racism, homophobia and sexism) was at the epicenter of the celebrity nude photo hack that released private pictures of Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Upton and many, many more (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/02/the-shadowy-world-of-4chan-the-shock-post-site-that-hosted-the-private-jennifer-lawrence-photos/). This release of private photos was conducted illegally in order to harm and embarrass female celebrities and while abhorrent, is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to online gender based harassment. Shortly after the pictures were released on 4chan, they were to be found on a similar site: Reddit.

Reddit is a website similar to 4chan in that it is formed of many different sub-communities. While the website has many benign areas focused on art and history, it is also home to much darker areas devoted to racism, sexism, pedophilia and rape (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/17/ellen-pao-reddit-sexist-racist-internet-trolls-winning). One obvious example of the sexist, online harassment that hangs over Reddit’s head is of course the celebrity photo scandal as mentioned above. A much darker and more disturbing example is to be found in the way in which the members of the website have interacted with management of the website. Between 2014 and 2015 Ellen Pao was the CEO of Reddit and made it clear that she intended to impose stronger content restrictions on the website when she had the subreddits “transfags” and “fatpeoplehate” shut down (The Guardian). In response to this presumed affront to free speech, a vocal minority of the website’s users began a coordinated campaign of harassment against Pao. While a regular petition for Pao’s removal formed, users also began to post Pao’s address, personal information, and to create memes focusing on her gender and race. One focusing point for the “anti-Pao” movement was her involvement in a sexual discrimination case previously in her career (http://www.newstatesman.com/sci-tech/2015/07/reddit-s-woman-problem). This supposedly served as evidence that Pao was only interested promoting the “female agenda” and served to fuel the vitriol towards her. In the end, she was forced to resign. Far from being the outlier, this treatment is often the norm for women who attempt to acquire and maintain status in the online community as is evidenced by the Gamergate “controversy”.

Gamergate is essentially the example to examine when discussing online, gender based harassment. The story of Gamergate starts when a vindictive ex-boyfriend of video game developer Zoey Quinn posted a blog accusing her of trading sexual favors for favorable video game reviews. The story ends with multiple women (Zoey Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, and Breanna Wu) being forced into hiding because of death threats, rape threats, and exposed personal addresses. After the blog post by Quinn’s ex-boyfriend
“outraged gamers took to Twitter, Reddit and 4chan by the tens of thousands to protest the so-called ethical breaches in gaming journalism…Some of the people sent Quinn death and rape threats so specific, so actionable, that she fled her house and called the cops,” (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2014/10/14/the-only-guide-to-gamergate-you-will-ever-need-to-read/)
When Anita Sarkeesian, a media critic, spoke out about the issue, she received the same treatment. Later, after making a joke online about the situation, Breanna Wu again received the same. All three of these women received this treatment for the same reason, because of their gender. This example of harassment thus proves to be the most disturbing of the three and truly a show of how dangerous online harassment can be.


            While the thinly veiled sexism and objectification found on mainstream internet sites is reprehensible, it is also important to see how dangerous and damaging sexist beliefs can be when allowed to ferment into their most extreme forms. Whether is an embarrassing and harmful release of intimate correspondence or it is a “specific and actionable death or rape threat,” harassment by anonymous online communities like 4chan and Reddit needs to have a light shined on it and needs to be ended.

Headlines About Women

I was inspired by the Buzzfeed article “13 Snarky News Headlines About Women, Improved”  and decided to make one of my own.

I started with googling accomplished women whom I respect — Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Lena Dunham, Emma Watson and more. I found a gross amount of headlines criticizing their bodies or what they’re wearing, and very few acknowledging their contributions to the political and/or artistic sphere. A common theme emerged as I found more headlines about women: their exterior is what matters most to editors and readers alike.

Maybe this doesn’t seem like a huge deal to some. But when women are given value mainly for their looks, everything else they do is forgotten about. Something as simple as these headlines can pave the way for women to be glossed over for their accomplishments, leading them to be discouraged knowing much of what they do will not be recognized. Whether these headlines compliment or shame female bodies, the message remains that their bodies are of greater importance than their minds.

So, here it is: headlines about famous women, improved. The faces of Loyola tell the story better than I could myself.


Women Displayed Negatively In Media

 Women in the press: BBC Article


Sex objects

A report by Object and three other women's campaign groups surveyed 11 British newspapers over a fortnight in September. It found "excessive objectification of women in some parts of the press, reducing them entirely to sexual commodities in a way that would not be broadcast on television, nor allowed in the workplace because of equality legislation".

Passive roles
Campaigners have long complained that there is a pronounced tendency across the whole of the media for women to disproportionately appear in passive roles - perhaps as victims of crime - instead of actually doing something.

Edwin Smith accepts there may be some truth in the argument that women are presented as victims, but that it reflects a wider culture.
"It's a symptom of how things have been. It is lazy but it has more widespread appeal to portray women as a victim. And the reader is more likely to sympathise with a woman victim."


Relative invisibility
Research by Women in Journalism this year, looking at a month of national newspaper newspapers, found that men wrote three quarters of all front-page articles and 84% of those mentioned or quoted in lead pieces were male.


Its a man's world

 24% of news stories globally about women in 2011, Media and Gender Monitor figures show
And women were focus of 19% of news stories about politics and government in 2010

Women in Journalism study showed 78% of front-page articles in British national newspapers written by men, and 84% of those quoted or mentioned are male
 
23% of newsmakers were women in 2010
 
76% of newspaper stories about US presidential election written by men, Women's Media Center figures show